Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 22,833
Butler v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Kendarius DeAndre Butler
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Corizon Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frost v. Davenport et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jared Dakota Frost
Defendant:
Jennifer Davenport, Byron Oliver, Alan Smitherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerley v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Steven Dale Byerley
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pleasant v. Yescare (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Ray Dean Pleasant
Defendant:
Yescare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bailey v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Christopher Randall Bailey
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Elliott et al
as 7:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Milton Wright
Defendant:
Elliott, Hill, Dixie Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Presley v. Osborn
as 7:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Bobby Presley
Defendant:
Stefan Osborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weingrad v. Keyes (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Ari P. Weingrad
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Swint v. Williams et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Darryl Swint
Defendant:
Karen Williams and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Hudson et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Timothy Price
Defendant:
Hudson, P Homes, Kitchens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
