District Court Cases in Georgia
Cases 61 - 70 of 163,222
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
YUN v. MINTON et al
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
ALEX YUN
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MINTON, PHILLIPS, WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
McRae v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Margie McRae
Defendant:
Brandon Vaughn and Patricia Austell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
BRISTOL et al v. BUTTS COUNTY GA et al
as 5:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
CURTIS BRISTOL and EDDIE BETHUNE
Defendant:
BUTTS COUNTY GA, GARY LONG and DEPUTY TAYLOR RICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FERGUSON v. MCDONALD'S
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR JAMES FERGUSON, JR
Defendant:
MCDONALD'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Linker et al v. Wormuth et al
as 4:2024cv00085
Defendant:
Stewart Hunter Housing, LLC, Christine E. Wormuth, Marne Homes and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Linker and Ashley Linker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (b) Federal Tort Claims Act
Gillespie v. Young et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert David Gillespie, Sr.
Defendant:
Lt. S. Young, Deputy Smith, Deputy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RT Bailey Construction, Inc. et al v. Towns at Skinner Mill LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Acevedo v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Juan Acevedo
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
