Third Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 75,262
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
SINGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06027
Plaintiff:
PRABHJOT SINGH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLETTE PETERS, RACHEL THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06025
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLETTE PETERS, RACHEL THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAH v. TURNER III et al
as 3:2024cv05988
Plaintiff:
PETER I. SHAH
Defendant:
JOHN G. TURNER III, PATRICIA M. KIPNIS, ELLIOTT C. MCGRAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
