Third Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 75,226
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Ashelman v. PrimeCare Medical Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Sean A. Ashelman
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical Inc., Selegrade, Dieago Remenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carver et al v. Talanca et al
as 3:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Anita Carver and Richard Carver
Defendant:
Jeremy Talanca, Brandon Gonzalez and Mayor Judith L. Mehlbaum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myers v. Wheeler
as 4:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Quincey Myers
Defendant:
Brandon Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DHARIA v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv05915
Plaintiff:
RAJESH DHARIA
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES, FBI, DAVID HADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MYERS v. CLEVELAND-CLIFFS et al
as 2:2024cv00684
Defendant:
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS, UAW - UNITED AUTO WORKERS, AK STEEL and others
Plaintiff:
JOE MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Renee Chrustowski v. NAACP Derrick Johnson
as 24-1847
Plaintiff:
RENEE A. CHRUSTOWSKI
Defendant:
NAACP DERRICK JOHNSON
HANDY v. NORDO et al
as 2:2024cv01905
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HANDY
Defendant:
DETECTIVE PHILIP NORDO, DETECTIVE OHMARR JENKINS, DETECTIVE GREGORY SINGLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
