Third Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 34,666
KUBS v. GANNON
as 2:2024cv04676
Petitioner:
KYLE-JOSEPH KUBS
Respondent:
JAMES GANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHORES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04651
Petitioner:
DEAN SHORES
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MUHAMMAD v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04724
Petitioner:
RAAJHAUN MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dwight Hill v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 24-1636
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT M. HILL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Daniel Stoffa v. Michael Zaken, et al
as 24-1638
Plaintiff:
DANIEL STOFFA
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, Superintendent SCI Greene, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FAYETTE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
PATEL v. GARLAND et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
KENI GAUTAMBHAI PATEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, TONY BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ROBERTSON v. PFURSICH
as 2:2024cv01488
Petitioner:
AARON BLAKE ROBERTSON
Respondent:
JACQUELYN E. PFURSICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 2:2024cv01446
Petitioner:
Barry Lee Hamilton
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHORES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04582
Petitioner:
DEAN SHORES
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THOMPSON v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01445
Petitioner:
YOLANDA THOMPSON
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
