US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Cases 61 - 70 of 51,618
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan v. Steele et al
as 3:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Defendant:
Michael B. Steele, Sarah Brown and Kevin Lee Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Greenfield v. The City of Scranton
as 3:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Larry Greenfield
Defendant:
The City of Scranton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
La Ronde-Bey v. Chica et al
as 3:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Noble Lester Keith La Ronde-Bey
Defendant:
Michael Chica, Rich P. White, Tyler Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitfield v. Christensen
as 1:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Jesse Whitfield
Respondent:
Warden Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whitfield v. Christensen
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Jesse Whitfield
Respondent:
Warden Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stansbury v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Kareem Stansbury
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Michael Gourley, Zachary Molsak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
