US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 9,997
MCCLARY v. STEWARD et al
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
RONALD MCCLARY
Defendant:
FNU STEWARD, FNU HARGROVE, SERGEANT RANSOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
RODERICK BOYKINS
Defendant:
S.R.G. CAPTAIN LOCKLEAR, (FNU SCOTT) MS. SCOTT, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. USA
as 1:2024cv00170
Petitioner:
JORDAN HART
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SMALL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
STEPHEN ALLEN SMALL, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TISDALE v. WEAVIL et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
IVORY JOE TISDALE
Defendant:
T.A. WEAVIL, DANNY ROGERS, VERONICA L. EDMINSTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PORTER v. YATES et al
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
ANTWAIN PORTER
Defendant:
YATES, ALFRED ALONZO SCOTT, JR., HARGROVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFITH v. UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ANN GRIFFITH
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNOX v. USA
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
CEDERICK EURYAN KNOX
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
NEAL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER LEE NEAL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
THOMPSON v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
BRANDON E. THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM, DURHAM COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANGELA ASHBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
