District Court Cases in North Carolina
Cases 21 - 30 of 87,390
Perez v. Reagle
as 5:2024hc02095
Petitioner:
Oscar Perez
Respondent:
Christina Reagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02094
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Perry v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Nancy J Perry
Defendant:
United States of America
Roesel v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 7:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Philip Roesel
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
WILLIAMS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2024cv00394
Petitioner:
DARYL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, JESSICA SAGE and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HOSKINSON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HOSKINSON
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BURROUGHS v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 3:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
ELLA BURROUGHS
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moseley v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Robert Daniel Moseley
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Lebron v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02093
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Lebron
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
