District of North Carolina Court Cases

Cases filed


Cases 31 - 40 of 59,215
Currence v. Grapenhauser et al
as 5:2018ct03038
Plaintiff: Kareem Jamal Currence
Defendant: Counselor Grapenhauser, Counselor Straub, Counselor Graham and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sims v. Andrews
as 5:2018hc02037
Petitioner: Jermaine Jerrell Sims
Respondent: J. Andrews
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Santiesteban v. Andrews
as 5:2018hc02036
Petitioner: Darvis Adib Santiesteban
Respondent: Justin Andrews
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GUIDRY v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00111
Plaintiff: JAMES T. GUIDRY
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WENTZ V. BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC., ET AL.
as 1:2018cv00109
Plaintiff: BETH L. WENTZ
Defendant: BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC., BIMBO BAKERIES USA PENSION PLAN- BBU HOURLY PLAN, BIMBO BAKERIES USA PENSION PLAN SUPPLEMENT A
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wilkes County v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 5:2018cv00030
Plaintiff: Wilkes County
Defendant: AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sweat v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00042
Plaintiff: Rebecca Dawn Sweat
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
ROGERS v. OFFICE OF DISABILITY ADJUDICATION AND REVIEW
as 1:2018cv00110
Plaintiff: SHARON SUZETTE ROGERS
Defendant: OFFICE OF DISABILITY ADJUDICATION AND REVIEW
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GODWIN v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00113
Plaintiff: MICHAEL GODWIN
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00040
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?