Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 165,245
Joe v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01101
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant:
BOP and SCFO - TDCJ Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Miss
as 3:2024cv00128
Petitioner:
Terry E. Johnson, III
Respondent:
Miss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bullock v. Hockley County Jail
as 5:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bullock
Defendant:
Hockley County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Langwell v. USA
as 2:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Weston Scott Langwell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Apodaca v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Victor Andrew Apodaca
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, Executive Director
as 6:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
John A Grimes
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farr, Sr. v. Ponthler et al
as 9:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Willie Ned Farr, Sr.
Defendant:
Courtney Tracy Ponthler, Robert J. Burby, Jessie C. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olvera-Galvan v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Olvera-Galvan
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Chambers v. SHU Staff at USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dontriel Chambers
Defendant:
SHU Staff at USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hall v. Welch, Jr.
as 9:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hall
Defendant:
Thomas H. Welch, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
