Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 165,186
JACKSON v. UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE et al
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE, CMC Pharmacy and University Texas Medical Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv01048
Petitioner:
Jim Wesley Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01046
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00159
Petitioner:
Darryl Glenn Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kahoe v. Tiffany et al
as 3:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown Tiffany, Unknown Peridoux and Unknown Staff Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardenas v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00443
Petitioner:
Isaac Cardenas
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kahoe v. Heemans et al
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant:
Karen Heemans and Justin Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orogun v. USA
as 3:2024cv01053
Petitioner:
Collins Orogun
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Aragones v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Nelson Aragones
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Braddock v. USA
as 4:2024cv00383
Petitioner:
Brandi Lee Braddock
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
