Sixth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 12,350
D'Andre Brown v. FBOP, et al
as 24-5403
Plaintiff:
D'ANDRE ROLAND BROWN
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE #1, being sued as "Lieutenant" USP McCreary, JOHN DOE #2, being sued as "Lieutenant" USP McCreary and others
Preston v. Davids et al
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Harvey Preston #235170
Defendant:
John Davids, Jim Dunigan, John Bonn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Cunningham et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Theron Hunter
Defendant:
Unknown Cunningham, Unknown Gaskill, Unknown Felver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Crews et al
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thompson
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Allyson Lambert, Amy Robey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Carbor et al
as 2:2024cv11093
Plaintiff:
Anthony Daniel Walker
Defendant:
Kim Carbor, Marienfield, Crane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thompson
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Allyson Lambert, Amy Robey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rickey Benson v. Kirk Fields, et al
as 24-5400
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
CHIEF JAILER KIRK FIELDS, and Subordinates
Rickey Benson v. Healthcare Staff of Shelby Cnty. Crim. Justice Ctr
as 24-5388
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
HEALTHCARE STAFF OF THE SHELBY COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER
Smith #443755 v. Hunt
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Fredricks Smith #443755
Defendant:
Unknown Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams #236300 v. Maleport et al
as 2:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Terry Wayne Williams #236300
Defendant:
Loretta Maleport, Cliff Shigwadja, James Corrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
