US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 7,519
Krieg v. Warden of USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Eric Krieg
Respondent:
Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
William Hernandez
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gardner v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Troy Gardner
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacy v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Marvell Jermaine Lacy, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. City of Covington et al
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Carlos Harris
Defendant:
City of Covington, Rob Sanders, Donald Buring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goff v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex
as 0:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Kamron Goff
Defendant:
Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman v. Green
as 0:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Khalil Coleman
Defendant:
David Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sneed v. Airmark et al
as 0:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant:
Airmark, Department of Corrections, Little Sandy Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M.T.B. v. Byers et al
as 2:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
M.T.B.
Respondent:
Shawn Byers and Jailer Jason Maydak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bennett et al v. USA
as 6:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Wanda Ellen Bennett and Michael Keith Bennett
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
