US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 71,161
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BLUE v. ELKINS et al
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
CRYSTAL ELKINS, MIAIAH J. POTWYN, MARK D. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MAYBERRY v. EMMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
JOSH MAYBERRY
Defendant:
DONALD EMMERSON, LPN, NP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GABALDON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
FRANK GABALDON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $106,503.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$106,503.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
DEVINE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. DEVINE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
YOUNG v. ACLU et al
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
MARION L. YOUNG, I
Defendant:
ACLU, KENNETH FAK and GAVIN M. ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. GILBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOYKINS
Defendant:
GILBERT, GORD, UNIT TEAM MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERDUE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY K. PERDUE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
