District Court Cases in Wisconsin
Cases 11 - 20 of 46,252
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Young, Howard v. Beavais, Chad et al
as 3:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Howard Lee Young, Ebboni Young and Ebboni Howard Young
Defendant:
Lt. Chad Beavais, Lt. Paul Rosenthal, Lt. Eric Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster, Eric v. Carver County Health and Human Services
as 3:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Eric John Foster
Defendant:
Carver County Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abt, Gary v. Johnson, D. et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Gary P. Abt
Defendant:
D. Johnson, Jenna L. Parks and Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hans Kissle, Inc. v. Echo Lake Foods Inc
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Hans Kissle, Inc.
Defendant:
Echo Lake Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lopez v. Tegels
as 2:2024cv00483
Petitioner:
Roberto I Lopez
Respondent:
Warden Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raney v. Goehl et al
as 2:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Adam Raney
Defendant:
Officer Goehl, Officer Wodak, Ashley Haseleu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Crisci
as 2:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
David J Thompson
Defendant:
CO Crisci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoffman, Tracy v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Tracy L Hoffman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Whitetail Ridge Trust CTO et al v. Benge et al
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Whitetail Ridge Trust CTO and Heavens Door Trust CTO
Defendant:
John Joseph Benge, Dr Keith Davis, Traci Thrap and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
