US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 10,202
Robinson v. Jackson et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Wallace Tremayne Robinson, Sr
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Brandon Davis, M Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Does
as 4:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Brunson Roberts
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Randy Randall
Defendant:
Eric S Higgins, Greg Henry and Will Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toston v Parson, et al
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Charles Toston
Defendant:
Rick Parson and Sharon Castleberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nard v. Does
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antoine C Nard
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rundel v. Turn Key Medical et al
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Robert Rundel
Defendant:
Turn Key Medical and Bailey Crocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurt v. Snyder et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Joshua Keith Hurt
Defendant:
Brad Snyder and Ashten Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shorty v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility et al
as 4:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Shorty, Jr
Defendant:
Pulaski County Regional Detention Center and Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barefield v. Conway et al
as 4:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Keya Deonte Barefield
Defendant:
Cynthia Conway, Joseph Mahoney, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liscomb v. Randel et al
as 4:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Liscomb
Defendant:
Kenyen Randel, Antonio D Johnson, Jr, Tod Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
