US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Cases 91 - 100 of 84,197
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01500
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Alexander v. Alexander et al
as 0:2024cv01503
Plaintiff:
Jomari E. Alexander, Sr.
Defendant:
Mandy M. Alexander, Christy Kaster-Snow, Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lovlie v. United States et al
as 0:2024cv01502
Plaintiff:
Jan H. Lovlie
Defendant:
United States, United States of America, United States Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wineman v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 0:2024cv01492
Plaintiff:
Brenda Wineman
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Mosure v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, The
as 0:2024cv01493
Plaintiff:
James Mosure
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fortner v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv01496
Petitioner:
Anthony Fortner
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
as 0:2024cv01499
Plaintiff:
Minnie Hill
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
United States of America v. Porter
as 0:2024cv01497
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Walter Porter
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
