Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 5,659
Solberg v. Eischen et al
as 0:2023cv03568
Petitioner:
John M. Solberg
Respondent:
B. Eischen, J. Kozulla, S. Hachey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chauvin v. USA
as 0:2023cv03512
Petitioner:
Derek Michael Chauvin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Harper v. Segal et al
as 0:2023cv03468
Plaintiff:
Kelly Harper
Defendant:
Warden Michael Segal, Susan Brown, Associate Warden Vaught and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robideau v. Stenseth
as 0:2023cv03402
Petitioner:
Raymond Clyde Robideau
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welch v. USA
as 0:2023cv03326
Petitioner:
Chris Maurice Welch
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ward v. King
as 0:2023cv03327
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Ward
Respondent:
Warden King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hunter v. USA
as 0:2023cv03323
Petitioner:
Paris La Monte Hunter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lindsey v. Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2023cv03299
Plaintiff:
Dale Allen Lindsey
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, Jodi Harpstead, Nicole Boder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seamon v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2023cv03302
Plaintiff:
Leonard-Deron Seamon
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections and Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2023cv03312
Petitioner:
Nikita Dixon
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Commissioner Paul Schnell and Warden Tracy Beltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
