Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 191 - 200 of 5,663
McReynolds v. Witt
as 0:2023cv02712
Petitioner:
Hajji Y. McReynolds
Respondent:
Sheriff Dawanna S. Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McReynolds v. Witt
as 0:2023cv02708
Petitioner:
Hajji Y. McReynolds
Respondent:
Sheriff Dawanna S. Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02718
Petitioner:
Christopher J Gonzalez
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McIntosh v. Williams
as 0:2023cv02696
Petitioner:
Patrick Randell McIntosh
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McIntosh v. Williams
as 0:2023cv02695
Petitioner:
Patrick Randell McIntosh
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Canada v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, Andrew Karlsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02692
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McReynolds v. Witt
as 0:2023cv02681
Petitioner:
Hajji Y. McReynolds
Respondent:
Dawanna S. Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alloway v. Segal
as 0:2023cv02667
Petitioner:
Pamela M. Alloway
Defendant:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Simon v. Segal
as 0:2023cv02640
Petitioner:
Markita D. Simon
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.