Ninth Circuit Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 1,127,659
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Sapan v. Network Capital Funding Corporation
as 8:2024cv01335
Plaintiff:
Paul Sapan
Defendant:
Network Capital Funding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Elkobaitry v. HOWMET GLOBAL FASTENING SYSTEMS INC. et al
as 2:2024cv05138
Plaintiff:
Hady Elkobaitry
Defendant:
HOWMET GLOBAL FASTENING SYSTEMS INC. and Howmet Aerospace Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rodriguez v. Rentokil North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv05144
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Rodriguez
Defendant:
Rentokil North America, Inc. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Smith et al
as 2:2024cv05143
Petitioner:
Del Meshay Smith and Netflix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Boyman v. Walt Disney Company The et al
as 2:2024cv05147
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Boyman
Defendant:
Walt Disney Company The and Google Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
