US District Court for the District of Alaska
Cases 131 - 140 of 7,381
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Young-God v. Lyou et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Young-God
Defendant:
Chris Lyou and Michael Guzy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schneider v. Pallenberg
as 3:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Lucas C. Schneider
Defendant:
Philip Pallenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kolendo et al v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District
as 3:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Ben Kolendo and Quinlen Schachle
Defendant:
Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heckert v. Potter et al
as 3:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jake Heckert
Defendant:
Corey Potter and THE F/V GAMBLER, OFFICIAL NUMBER ___
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Flora v. Windy Bay, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Michael Flora
Defendant:
Windy Bay, LLC, The Port Graham Corporation and M/V TRANSPORTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Apangalook v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Charlene Apangalook
Defendant:
United States of America, Charles Baldwin and Alaska Native Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Martin v. State of Alaska
as 4:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
Danny W. Martin
Defendant:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Havens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Krystle Marie Havens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
