US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Cases 121 - 130 of 22,001
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Bob Riley, John Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Ivey et al
as 2:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Hal Taylor, Laura Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharma v. Peters et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Sohrab Sharma
Defendant:
Colette Peters and W D Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bailey v. McClain et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
James Leslie Bailey
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Randolph County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Rogers (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
James Leslie Bailey
Defendant:
Captain Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bass v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Christine Bass
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Martin v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Silas Martin
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dennard v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Virgil Dennard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
