US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama

Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 18,620
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00433
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Searight v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00429
Defendant: Captain Lawson, Alabama Department of Corrections, John Crow and others
Plaintiff: John Searight
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Smoak (INMATE 2)
as 1:2020cv00428
Defendant: Jason Smoak
Plaintiff: Sean D. Washington
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Sullivan et al
as 2:2020cv00425
Defendant: Michael T. Bunn, Kelly Barron, Russell Thomas and others
Plaintiff: Michael-Everet Dennison, Jr., Brandon-Kyle Johnson
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00430
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Bobby Thomas
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Shack v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00426
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections, Patrice Richie Jones, Benard Fitzpatrick and others
Plaintiff: Leonard Shack
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
American General Life Insurance Company v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2020cv00432
Defendant: Teresita Freeman, Chandra S. Mitchell
Plaintiff: American General Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Interpleader Action
Type: Contract Insurance
Christensen v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00431
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Heather Christensen
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00427
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Staton Medical Unit et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00423
Defendant: Officer Jones, Staton Medical Unit
Plaintiff: Christopher Allen Haynes
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?