US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama

Cases filed
Cases 61 - 70 of 18,636
Johnson v. Neptune Technology Group, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00419
Defendant: Neptune Technology Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Marcus Johnson
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act
Kister v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00414
Defendant: Michael Borowicz, Ruth Naglich, Darryl Ellis and others
Plaintiff: John Andrew Kister
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulmer v. Alabama State Employees Credit Union
as 2:2020cv00417
Defendant: Alabama State Employees Credit Union
Plaintiff: Stephanie Fulmer
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act
Butler v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00415
Defendant: State of Alabama, Warden Miles, Joseph Headley and others
Plaintiff: Jerry Jerome Butler
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagler v. Johnson et al
as 2:2020cv00418
Defendant: Orlando Ozell Johnson, Mondelez Global, LLC
Plaintiff: Joseph Carl Hagler
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Auto Negligence
Mathis v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2020cv00413
Defendant: Jason Smoak, Commander Brazier, Mrs. Farrell and others
Plaintiff: Raymond Mathis
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00416
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Wells v. Haynes Ambulance of Alabama, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00410
Plaintiff: George Gary Wells
Defendant: Haynes Ambulance of Alabama, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act
Potts v. United States of America (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00411
Plaintiff: Demetriss Santell Potts
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Walmart Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2020cv00406
Defendant: Walmart Store #00938, Walmart Inc.
Plaintiff: Peter James Smith
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?