US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Cases 61 - 70 of 22,002
Simplot AB Retail, Inc. v. Hamilton
as 2:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Simplot AB Retail, Inc. doing business as Simplot Grower Solutions
Defendant:
Oscar L. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson et al v. Pirtle
as 1:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Betty Johnson and J. R.
Defendant:
Lisa Pirtle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Nancy Buckner, Brandon Hardin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
BMO Bank N.A. v. Geneva Logistics, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Geneva Logistics, LLC and Vince Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Binion v. City of Clanton et al
as 2:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Binion
Defendant:
City of Clanton, City Council Clanton and Jeff Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Brown et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Nona Adams Brown, Joseph Angelo, Paul Weatherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florence v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Florence
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Futral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis Ice Cream Alabama v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Davis Ice Cream Alabama doing business as Ice Cream Warehouse
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Collins v. Hatfield et al
as 2:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Tyler Collins
Defendant:
Larry Hatfield and Matt Spradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
