US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 128
Christman v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
as 1:2021cv00135
Defendant:
Consolidated Rail Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ross Christman
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Garritano v. CSX Transportation Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00058
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Garritano
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc and CSX Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Jaranowski v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
as 2:2020cv00484
Defendant:
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Martin Jaranowski
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Furry v. Gary Railway Company
as 2:2020cv00466
Plaintiff:
Mark Furry
Defendant:
Gary Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Chatman v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company et al
as 2:2020cv00409
Defendant:
Renzenberger, Inc., Alysha Guy, Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company and others
Plaintiff:
James Chatman
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Ghoston et al v. Gary Railway Company et al
as 2:2020cv00402
Plaintiff:
Denisha Ghoston, Dennis Ghoston and Dennis A Ghoston
Defendant:
United States Steel Corporation and Gary Railway Company
Not Classified By Court:
Thomas Hogan
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Cerny v. Norfolk Southern
as 3:2020cv00814
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern
Plaintiff:
John Cerny
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Dyer v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co et al
as 2:2020cv00284
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co, Jovon Pippin and Professional Transportation Inc
Plaintiff:
Cody Dyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beebout v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 4:2020cv00061
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Beebout
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
Terence M Austgen
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 56
Williams v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2020cv00343
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Kyle F Williams
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
