US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 14,384
Mulder v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02070
Petitioner:
William Brian Mulder
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Simpler v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02071
Petitioner:
Jimmy Edward Simpler
Respondent:
David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Earp v. USA
as 5:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
Deandre Earp
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Clark v. USA
as 7:2024cv00299
Petitioner:
Joshua Clark
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Middleton v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02066
Petitioner:
Lamar Middleton
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Blakney v. Garland et al
as 5:2024hc02067
Petitioner:
Larry Blakney
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
King v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02068
Petitioner:
Darnell William King
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Partin v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02069
Petitioner:
Antwon Devon Partin
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Trent v. Duplin County Jail et al
as 5:2024ct03074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Trent and Kendra Belle Trent
Defendant:
Duplin County Jail, Captain Hanchey and Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Campbell et al
as 5:2024ct03073
Plaintiff:
Michael Quincy Hampton
Defendant:
Sgt. Campbell, Corporal Kraft, Corporal Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
