US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 41 - 50 of 23,831
HENDERSON v. SHANLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
JEREMY LAMOND HENDERSON
Defendant:
ASHLIE SHANLEY, NATHANIEL KNUST, VAN WORTH SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GRIFFITH v. OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ANN GRIFFITH
Defendant:
OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARLEY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW FARLEY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
MATTHEWS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
JUSTIN GUNSAIN MATTHEWS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
SWINSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
CHARLES ANTHONY SWINSON, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
LUFKIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
NILDA LUFKIN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HJHN PROPERTIES, LLC v. CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANIES
as 1:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
HJHN PROPERTIES, LLC
Defendant:
CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
ROGERS v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
rodney rogers
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
