US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 2,939
Gibson v. Dollar General
as 7:2023cv01064
Plaintiff:
Debra Yuniece Gibson
Defendant:
Dollar General, Jeff Owen and Nakeshia M.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peake v. Robinson
as 4:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
McArthur Peake
Defendant:
Sergeant Timothy Dewayne Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffin v. Eubanks
as 2:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
Jewel Griffin
Defendant:
Sgt David Eubanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ingram Bey v. Rosser
as 3:2023cv01052
Plaintiff:
Eric Jamar Ingram Bey
Defendant:
Daniel Rosser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bishop v. Leeds, City of
as 2:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bishop, Sr
Defendant:
Leeds, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Higginbotham v. Hueytown, Alabama, The City of et al
as 2:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Barry C Higginbotham
Defendant:
Hueytown, Alabama, The City of, Steve Ware, Mike Yarbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haney v. Talladega, City of et al
as 1:2023cv01026
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Haney
Defendant:
Talladega, City of and Mohamed Sow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Grimes v. UAB Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
John Grimes
Defendant:
UAB Hospital and Redwine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Homeriver Group For MCH SFR Property Owner 2, LLC v. Kingsley
as 7:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Homeriver Group For MCH SFR Property Owner 2, LLC
Defendant:
Prescott Kingsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Howard v. Pickens County Alabama
as 7:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Pickens County Alabama, Keith Booty Cox, Jeremy Herd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
