Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 5,290
Thompson v. The City of Florence
as 3:2023cv01501
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thompson
Defendant:
The City of Florence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Catoe v. City of Sheffield Alabama et al
as 3:2023cv01496
Plaintiff:
Will Catoe
Defendant:
City of Sheffield Alabama, Ricky Terry, Scott Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmondson et al v. City of Boaz Alabama et al
as 4:2023cv01498
Plaintiff:
Ronald Edmondson and Shirley Edmondson
Defendant:
City of Boaz Alabama and Mark Layne Turk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Maddox v. U. S. Department of Education (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00643
Plaintiff:
Frances Elizabeth Maddox
Defendant:
Southern Union State Community College and U. S. Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKenney et al v. Margaret, Alabama, City of et al
as 2:2023cv01486
Plaintiff:
Devantae McKenney and Dexter Pickett
Defendant:
City of Margaret, Alabama, Christobal Sanchez, Alfa Insurance Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Rump (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheila Rump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton, Jr. v. Brooks (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Connie Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Town of Gordon (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00639
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Houston County (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Houston County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Ray (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Shana Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
