Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 17,401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bothwell v. AS-2 LLC
as 2:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Shabrieka Bothwell
Defendant:
AS-2 LLC doing business as Aire Serv of Birmingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Farmer & Associates, Inc. v. The Utilities Board of the Town of Maplesville et al
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
. Farmer & Associates, Inc. and Farmer & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
The Utilities Board of the Town of Maplesville, a public corporation, Shelby James Posey and The Utilities Board of the Town of Maplesville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Lowndes County Sheriff Office et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
James Martin
Defendant:
Lowndes County Sheriff Office and Christopher West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
