Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,611
Parker v. Abbett et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2025cv00085
Plaintiff:
Neville W. Parker
Defendant:
Jimmy Abbett, Chance Hunt, Steven Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Wilson et al (INMATE 1)
as 5:2025cv00145
Plaintiff:
Marcus D McQueen
Defendant:
Rosalynn Wilson, Curtis Washington and Dee Dee Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden Mitchell et al
as 1:2025cv00079
Defendant:
Warden Mitchell, Derrick Dent, Lt. McLaurin and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Devonterrious Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Sheriff, Talladega County Jail
as 1:2025cv00062
Plaintiff:
David Jones, III
Defendant:
Jimmy Kilgore, Transporting Officer #1 and Transporting Officer # 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Jones (INMATE 1)
as 1:2025cv00009
Defendant:
Patrick B. Jones, III
Plaintiff:
Marion S. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cargill v. United States et al
as 2:2025cv00022
Defendant:
United States, Melissa K. Atwood and United States Attorneys Office
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Y. Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramson v. Houston
as 3:2025cv00004
Defendant:
Harold Houston
Plaintiff:
Donald Eric Ramson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waldrep v. Abbott (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Jon Wayne Waldrep
Defendant:
Circuit Court Tallapoosa Co. AL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fluker v. Horton
as 4:2024cv01726
Petitioner:
Terry A Fluker
Respondent:
Jonathan W Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Page
as 4:2024cv01694
Defendant:
Thomas Page
Plaintiff:
Bradley Edward Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
