Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 5,612
Gafford v. Butler County Sheriff's Office et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00710
Defendant:
Butler County Sheriff's Office and Quality Correctional Health Care
Plaintiff:
David Scott Gafford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Jones
as 2:2024cv01483
Defendant:
Patrick B Jones, III
Plaintiff:
Marion S Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2024cv01481
Defendant:
Lauderdale County Detention Center Staff and Administration, NAPHCARE, Lauderdale Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Quintus Bernard Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
John Marshall
Defendant:
Austin Billingsley, Cody Williams, Leonard Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. McMillian
as 2:2024cv01419
Defendant:
Donald McMillian
Plaintiff:
Henry Clay Smith, .
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Wilson et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00634
Defendant:
Curtis Washington, Rosalynn Wilson and Dee Dee Wilson
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smoot v. Pettway et al
as 2:2024cv01367
Defendant:
Mark Pettway, Willie Hill, D. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Smoot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spratling v. Abbett et al
as 2:2024cv01356
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Spratling
Defendant:
Ms. Knight, A. Wilson and Jimmy Abbett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Malone
as 4:2024cv01323
Defendant:
Dr. Malone, Timothy Bozarth and John East
Plaintiff:
Kenov Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Marbury et al
as 5:2024cv01321
Defendant:
Chiquita Marbury and Corey LNU
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
