District Court Cases in Arkansas
Cases 41 - 50 of 66,455
Auton v. Straughn et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Defendant:
Justin Parker, Thomas W Hurst, William F Straughn and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Auton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivory v. Sosa et al
as 4:2024cv00749
Defendant:
Griffin, Sosa and Bowie
Plaintiff:
Allen Ivory, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merrill v. Evans et al
as 4:2024cv00751
Defendant:
Evans, Norwood and Mills
Plaintiff:
Donald Merrill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chism v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00752
Defendant:
Roslynn Williams, Kejana Taylor, Justine Minor and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Chism
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00748
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Tina Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Burton v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00741
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and Arkansas, State of
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Bi Haven Investments
as 3:2024cv00147
Defendant:
Bi Haven Investments
Plaintiff:
Torin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunahue v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00739
Defendant:
Marshall Reed, Willam Straughn, Michael Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald L Dunahue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Does
as 4:2024cv00740
Defendant:
Does
Plaintiff:
Jason Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newman v. Brown et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
Chris Devon Newman
Defendant:
Latasha Williams, Deshaun Thomas, Marquis Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.