Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 13,562
Justice v. Hanuska et al
as 2:2024cv02047
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dakota Justice
Defendant:
Emily Hanuska, Elizabeth Woolsey, LIEUTENANT Samantha Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Randy Randall
Defendant:
Eric S Higgins, Greg Henry and Will Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toston v Parson, et al
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Charles Toston
Defendant:
Rick Parson and Sharon Castleberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horn v. Peterson et al
as 6:2024cv06049
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lemuel Horn
Defendant:
Mrs. Peterson, Lieutenant Martin and Sergeant Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nard v. Does
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antoine C Nard
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rundel v. Turn Key Medical et al
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Robert Rundel
Defendant:
Turn Key Medical and Bailey Crocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Henry
as 6:2024cv06048
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Walker, III
Defendant:
Dr Guy Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurt v. Snyder et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Joshua Keith Hurt
Defendant:
Brad Snyder and Ashten Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shorty v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility et al
as 4:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Shorty, Jr
Defendant:
Pulaski County Regional Detention Center and Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ralston v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv05082
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wayne Ralston
Defendant:
Judge Casey Jones, Judge Mark Lindsay, Corey Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
