Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 44,548
Miles v. Does 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Does 1, John Does 2, John Does 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hines et al
as 1:2024cv02796
Plaintiff:
Craig Williams and Kathyleen Monrose
Defendant:
Hines and Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goston v. Winnebago County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv50133
Plaintiff:
Terrance Edward Goston
Defendant:
Winnebago County Jail and Captain Justin Egler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrasco v. Guevara et al
as 1:2024cv02800
Plaintiff:
Ricco F. Carrasco
Defendant:
Guevara and Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snowden v. USA
as 3:2024cv01061
Petitioner:
Donald V. Snowden
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Seger v. Department of Human Services
as 3:2024cv01057
Petitioner:
Logan S Seger
Respondent:
State of Illinois Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Townsend v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
Joeseph Townsend
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, James D. Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Lodge et al
as 4:2024cv04058
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Paula Lodge, Shan Jumper, . Queen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruffin v. Wilhem et al
as 4:2024cv04059
Plaintiff:
Mwamba M Ruffin
Defendant:
Chase Wilhem, Mark N Williams, Tyrone Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Cole
as 1:2024cv02804
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brandon Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
