US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 40,838
Gregory v White County Superior Court et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Isaac William Gregory
Defendant:
White County Superior Court, Brad Wooley, Laura Cosgray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cunningham et al v. Keystone RV Company
as 3:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Troy Cunningham and Jennifer Cunningham
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Villar v. TA Operating, LLC d/b/a Travelcenters of America
as 2:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Nataly Villar
Defendant:
TA Operating, LLC d/b/a Travelcenters of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PASCHAL v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
AARON PASCHAL
Defendant:
Com'r of Soc. S Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SHILTS v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
LORI ANNE SHILTS
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Butler v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00371
Petitioner:
Taurus Butler
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zellers v. Fifth 3rd Bank
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Zellers, Jr
Defendant:
Fifth 3rd Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. South Bend Parole District #8 et al
as 3:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Frederick James Burton
Defendant:
South Bend Parole District #8, Redding and Ludy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fox v. Collins et al
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Ryan Wayne Fox
Defendant:
Cathy Collins, Candace Johnston, Caleb Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
