US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 40,826
v. Yadon et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Defendant:
Cari Yadon and Walmart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Such v. Pilot Travel Centers LLC d/b/a Flying J Travel Center
as 2:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
George Such
Defendant:
Pilot Travel Centers LLC d/b/a Flying J Travel Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
English v. Social Security
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Michael L. English
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lopez et al v. Dakich et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Ph.D. Dr. Linda Lopez and Impact Strategies, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas P. Dakich, Ryan D. Lafler, Greater South Shore Technology Initiative, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Campos v. Walmart Inc
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Maria Campos
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Armour v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00356
Petitioner:
Rickey R Armour
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Morales
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Billy Williams
Defendant:
Morales
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
