US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 14,420
Johnson v. Harnett County Detention Center
as 5:2024ct03046
Plaintiff:
William Kirk Johnson
Defendant:
Harnett County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartee v. USA
as 5:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Romar Leshawn Bartee, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Graham v. USA
as 7:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Darion Graham
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McCall v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02041
Petitioner:
Dashawn Jewelin McCall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Townes v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2024ct03044
Plaintiff:
Michael Townes
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, Lieutenant Eastwood and Officer Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. City of Durham et al
as 5:2024ct03041
Plaintiff:
Brandon E. Thompson
Defendant:
City of Durham, Durham County Police Department, Angela Ashby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDuffie v. Baker et al
as 5:2024ct03042
Plaintiff:
Prentis McDuffie
Defendant:
Matthew Baker and Russell Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Clark et al
as 5:2024ct03043
Plaintiff:
John Frank Miller
Defendant:
Ms. Clark, Ms. Lee, Cpt. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02039
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02040
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
