US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 11 - 20 of 23,879
MARSHALL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
TIERRA MARSHALL
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
STUESSY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
JENNA STUESSY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
LEWIS v. SURBHI
as 1:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
LLOYD T. LEWIS
Defendant:
MD JANE SURBHI and NICOLE R. RAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WESTBROOOK v. ADT SOLAR, LLC
as 1:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WESTBROOK
Defendant:
ADT SOLAR, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WEST BEND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. PRO PLUMBING SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
WEST BEND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
PRO PLUMBING SERVICES, LLC, CAMERON JAMES MOLTICH and JOANNA L. LEEDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
TERRY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00385
Petitioner:
DOYLE KENT TERRY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BANNER v. ROWDY et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
MONTREALL BANNER
Defendant:
C/O ROWDY, C/O GOMEZ, MAC MILLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Material Witne:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
WHITEHURST v. TEXT BEHIND et al
as 1:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
LARRY TERRELL WHITEHURST
Defendant:
TEXT BEHIND and VIAPATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
