US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Cases 31 - 40 of 25,858
Medina v. USA
as 3:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Felix Medina
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Alexander v. USA
as 3:2024cv00449
Petitioner:
James Arden Alexander
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hallman v. USA
as 3:2024cv00450
Petitioner:
Cameron Jamond Hallman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rojo v. USA
as 3:2024cv00446
Petitioner:
Agustin Bueno Rojo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DMARC Advisor BV v. Blank Rome LLP
as 1:2024mc00002
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Woodworth v. The Building Center, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Russell Woodworth
Defendant:
The Building Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Harris v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 3:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Laurey Harris
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Edwards v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Brenda Edwards
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Parker v. Myers Park Opco, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Parker, as Administrator of The Estate of Betty Angela Parker
Defendant:
Myers Park Opco, LLC and The Portopiccolo Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Barnes, et al v. United States Department of Interior, et al
as 1:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Don Barnes and James Bice
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, National Park Service, Great Smokey Mountains National Park and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
