US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Cases 21 - 30 of 25,865
Jones v. Ishee
as 1:2024cv00138
Petitioner:
Rodney Moucell Jones
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fleming v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Fleming
Defendant:
Talena Lee, Anthony J. Mincey, FNU Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00455
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Dennie v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Dennie
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfers
Frederick v. Propst et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michel Frederick
Defendant:
Jon Propst and City of Lincolnton, NC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vila v. Fashivly, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Carlos Vila
Defendant:
Fashivly, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Carpenter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Carpenter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Pavkovich v. USA
as 5:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ben Pavkovich
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
American Rescue Workers, Inc. et al v. Glory Mountain Ministries et al
as 1:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
American Rescue Workers, Inc. and American Rescue Workers
Defendant:
Glory Mountain Ministries, Byron Martin, Shahrzad Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
