North Dakota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,226
Puttman v. USA
as 1:2023cv00111
Petitioner:
Otis Lewis Puttman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Abdikarim v. State of North Dakota et al
as 3:2023cv00107
Petitioner:
Zakariya A. Abdikarim
Respondent:
State of North Dakota, Kimberly Higvik, Derick Steiner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. North Dakota, State of
as 1:2023cv00104
Petitioner:
Garron Gonzalez
Respondent:
North Dakota, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curtis et al v. Fargo, City of et al
as 3:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Shane Michael Curtis, Danial Ray Curtis and Oddessa Rodriguez
Defendant:
Fargo, City of, Fargo Police Department, Fargo Building Inspector and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoff v. Sayler et al
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hoff
Defendant:
James Sayler, Stephanie Graving, Jessica Wilkens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cartwright v. Ray
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Walter William Cartwright, III
Defendant:
Captain Chris Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torkelsen v. State of North Dakota
as 1:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
Steven A. Torkelsen
Respondent:
State of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoff v. Krabbenhoft et al
as 1:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hoff
Defendant:
Dave Krabbenhoft, Colby Brawn, Joey Joyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oien v. Pringle
as 3:2023cv00081
Petitioner:
Jason Wayne Oien
Respondent:
Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. USA
as 3:2023cv00076
Petitioner:
Leona Yoki Washington
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
