Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 50,067
PROPER v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
STUART J. PROPER
Respondent:
SUPT. THOMPSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ORAVEC v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2024cv00531
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ORAVEC
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI MERCER and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TROUPE v. SUNDAY et al
as 2:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN TROUPE
Defendant:
SGT SUNDAY, SUPERINTENDENT ORLANDO HARPER and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Salamon et al
as 1:2024cv00598
Petitioner:
Fabian Alexander Cook
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Salamon, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMALL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01483
Plaintiff:
GARNET SMALL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RICE v. KARASTON et al
as 2:2024cv01501
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RICE
Defendant:
C/O KARASTON, C/O MANTUCE, C/O ANTWON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: JERRELL ROBINSON
as 2:2024cv01509
Plaintiff:
JERRELL ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZERUTH v. USA
as 2:2024cv00520
Petitioner:
JUSTIN ZERUTH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ZERUTH v. USA
as 2:2024cv00538
Petitioner:
JUSTIN ZERUTH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
NELSON v. LAUREL et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
BRIAN NELSON
Defendant:
SECRETARY HARRY LAUREL, JORGE DOMINICIS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
