Rhode Island Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 363
MMT, Inc. v. Hydro International, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00027
Defendant:
Hydro International, Inc., Hydro International, plc and HIL Technology
Plaintiff:
MMT, Inc. and MMT, Inc. doing business as StormTree
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Jay Blahnik Inc. v. WaterRower Inc.
as 1:2021cv00026
Defendant:
WaterRower Inc.
Plaintiff:
JAY BLAHNIK INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Lock & Key Portraits & Boudoir/ Studio XO, LLC et al v. Tierney et al
as 1:2020cv00513
Defendant:
Amanda L. Tierney and Elizabeth M. Palmer
Plaintiff:
Lock & Key Portraits & Boudoir/ Studio XO, LLC and Karissa Starcevich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Philpot v. Santos
as 1:2020cv00238
Plaintiff:
Larry Philpot
Defendant:
Derek Santos
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Hanley v. Gensco Laboratories LLC
as 1:2020cv00218
Defendant:
Gensco Laboratories LLC
Plaintiff:
Mary E Hanley
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Tarducci v. Coates
as 1:2020cv00069
Plaintiff:
Mia Tarducci
Defendant:
Kristen Coates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Sequin, LLC v. Kimberly Renk, et al.
as 1:2020cv00062
Plaintiff:
Sequin, LLC
Defendant:
Kimberly Renk and John Doe Corp. d/b/a Sequin, Kimberly Renk and John Doe Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
ALCOR Scientific Inc. v. Research & Diagnostic Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00629
Defendant:
Marcel Veronneau, Research & Diagnostic Systems, Inc. and Bio-Techne Corporation
Plaintiff:
ALCOR Scientific Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Kiel James Patrick, LLC et al v. Feishuang et al
as 1:2019cv00595
Plaintiff:
Kiel James Patrick, LLC and Kiel James Patrick Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Gu Feishuang, Cloudflare, Inc., PayPal, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baby Delight, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00559
Plaintiff:
Baby Delight, Inc.
Defendant:
Lorne Jason Clute and Keezio Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
