South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 191 - 200 of 24,856
Gurley v. Oconee County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gurley
Defendant:
Oconee County Sheriff's Office, Office of Solicitor for the Tenth Judicial Circuit, Oconee County Clerk of Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Forrest v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Kevin Forrest
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. Richland County
as 3:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
Lavern Justin Reed
Defendant:
Richland County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Padillas v. Bodiford
as 6:2024cv00902
Petitioner:
Roberto Padillas
Respondent:
Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Dyer v. USA
as 2:2024cv00942
Petitioner:
Cameron Dyer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Sayles v. USA
as 8:2024cv00875
Petitioner:
John Robert Sayles
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Spade v. Sharp
as 1:2024cv00866
Petitioner:
Daniel William Spade
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lotharp v. Joseph
as 4:2024cv00858
Petitioner:
Zannie J. Lotharp and Zannie Jay Lotharp
Respondent:
Warden M. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chestnut v. Rhodes
as 1:2024cv00871
Petitioner:
Raymond Chestnut
Respondent:
D. Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Deleston v. Charleston County Police Department
as 2:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Ryan Deleston
Defendant:
Charleston County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
