US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Cases 101 - 110 of 7,865
Wilson v. Haaland
as 4:2024cv04025
Plaintiff:
Iris Wilson
Defendant:
Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hines v. Rosado et al
as 4:2024cv04025
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hines
Defendant:
Raymond Rosado, Howard Moore and Antonio Urquiola Cortinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wheeler v. Long et al
as 5:2024cv05008
Plaintiff:
Charles David Wheeler, Sr.
Defendant:
John Long, Frank Martinez, Pine Ridge Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Moon v. USA
as 4:2024cv04023
Petitioner:
Michael Scott Moon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bruns v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Company of Nebraska
as 4:2024cv04022
Plaintiff:
Amy Bruns
Defendant:
Farmers Mutual Insurance Company of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bailey v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv05007
Plaintiff:
Kirbesha Bailey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Brewer v. Bittinger et al
as 4:2024cv04021
Petitioner:
Paul Michael Brewer
Respondent:
Warden Teresa Bittinger and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Sogn et al
as 4:2024cv04020
Plaintiff:
Tristen Anderson
Defendant:
Jon Sogn, Koln Fink and Robin Houwman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
