District Court Cases in Tennessee
Cases 101 - 110 of 89,214
United States of America v. Adecco, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02389
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ralph Conrad
Garnishee:
Adecco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Tillis et al v. Parson et al
as 2:2024cv02392
Plaintiff:
Aluntra R. Tillis and Kevin Brown
Defendant:
Cameran L. Parson and EAN Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Elnour v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02394
Petitioner:
Mohamed Elnour
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perry v. Vantell
as 2:2024cv02406
Petitioner:
Courtney Perry
Respondent:
Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnold v. Cox et al
as 1:2024cv01122
Plaintiff:
Terrance Arnold, II
Defendant:
Jeremy Cox and Lexington Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Shelby County Jail
as 2:2024cv02402
Plaintiff:
Decodeo Marquez Moore and Decardo Marquez Moore
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv02403
Plaintiff:
Cameron Reynard Allen
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Officer Jones, Officer Kirkland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv02404
Plaintiff:
Jaylen L. Johnson
Defendant:
Capt. Johnson, Chief Rugg, Lt. Cleaves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardaway v. Wingmann, LLC
as 2:2024cv02388
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hardaway
Defendant:
Wingmann, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
