Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 24,534
Ford v. Pound
as 3:2024cv00151
Petitioner:
Micah Joshua Ford and Joseph I Tolbert
Respondent:
Zach Pound
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonds v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02205
Petitioner:
Brandon Bonds
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Reese v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02206
Petitioner:
Erik Reese
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
King v. Rose et al
as 1:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Jacorey King
Defendant:
Warden Rose, Officer McCrainey, Unknown Transportation Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
James D Duncan
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Gregory et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Tylier D Ward
Defendant:
Keith Gregory, Chief Cantrell, Sara Summerall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv01070
Petitioner:
Jeremy Sims
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Enix v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Tyler Ward Enix
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
English v. Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Jon English
Defendant:
Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole, Core Civic Prison and RDAP Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beeler, Jr. v. Goin
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Peter Steven Beeler, Jr.
Defendant:
Curtis Goin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
