US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 251 - 260 of 517
Carmel Capital, LLC v. Studio B Interior Design, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00424
Defendant:
Brandy Jones and Studio B Interior Design, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carmel Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Instacart v. Cornershop Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00240
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Cornershop Technologies, Inc., Delivery Technologies US, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Maplebear Inc. dba Instacart
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Solomon v. Yosief
as 9:2020cv00145
Defendant:
Kidana Yosief
Plaintiff:
Esseyas Debesay Solomon
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Llerrah, Inc
as 4:2020cv00377
Defendant:
Llerrah, Inc
Plaintiff:
Minden Pictures, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Design Collection, Inc v. BELK, INC.
as 9:2020cv00083
Defendant:
BELK, INC.
Plaintiff:
Design Collection, Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Glynn v. Alderson et al
as 4:2020cv00098
Defendant:
Lasoa, Inc., Larry W Alderson, Jr. and Sonjanette C. Alderson
Plaintiff:
Bryan Glynn
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Jones Jr. v. SkooIiepalooza.com et al
as 2:2019cv00399
Defendant:
Nick J. West, Russell D. Bishop, Skooliepalooza LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Jones Jr.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Aldredge
as 2:2019cv00382
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Crudup Music, Rondor Music International, Inc. d/b/a Irving Music and others
Defendant:
Byron David Aldredge
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wild v. RAINWATER EXTERMINATING COMPANY, INC.
as 4:2019cv00755
Plaintiff:
Alexander Lewis Wild
Defendant:
RAINWATER EXTERMINATING COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Carmel Capital, LLC v. Progressive Real Estate Solutions LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00725
Defendant:
W. Harry Ridge, III, Progressive Real Estate Solutions LLC and Metroplex Capital Corporation
Plaintiff:
Carmel Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
