US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 22,828
Clark v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Herbert Charles Clark
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00213
Petitioner:
Willie Ty'rone Carr
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Alatan v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Olotin Alfred Alatan
Defendant:
United States of America, Gus Saper and Lourdes Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carr v. Morin et al
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Willie Ty'rone Carr
Defendant:
Brad Morin and Michael Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Garcia v. Disciplinary Department
as 6:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Disciplinary Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Jerry Ray Brown
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anderson v. Monroe
as 6:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Anderson
Defendant:
Regional Director Carol Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Busby v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 6:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Busby
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duvall v. Gregg County Sheriff
as 6:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Steven Lee Duvall
Respondent:
Gregg County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solomon v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
Surafel H. Solomon
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
